Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labeled for deletion.
See Archive: Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 1
Not a Sexuality[]
I don't see a reason for this category. It's mostly used to make fun of sexualities. Miley Spears Discordian American Princess (let's talk) 20:34, July 13, 2020 (UTC)
Highsexual[]
I don't think this should be here, point blank. At best, it's misinformed, and at worst, it promotes full blown dangerous ideas about sexuality and consent. Yes, you can feel sexual urges while high, but that is nowhere near the same as having a label that you can be fuy aware of and identify as. You can't make informed decisions while impaired, and enabling people to "express their sexuality" while under the influence is how you end up with unwanted pregnancies, STIs, and DATE RAPE. Just because someone is physically aroused or they can't say no while high/drunk, IT DOES NOT MEAN THEY HAVE CONSENTED TO SEX. The article's deletion note states "I feel disturbed by this", but I think that's a huge understatement. It's beyond disgusting, it's straight up harmful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NebulaRanger (talk • contribs)
-deleted due to unanimous community consent. Miiohau (talk) 01:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Onesexual[]
Please do not delete this page, it's actually been pretty insightful for myself and others, I'm sure. It is a real thing that can happen, falling in love with and only beings sexually/romantically attracted to one person exclusively. Sometimes it can be related to defunct empathy and attachment parts of the brain, but it's definitely not impossible for regular people to experience as well. It definitely can be difficult to live with, but if you find and receive returned feelings from your exclusive person, it's something I, personally, feel you can be proud of. There's virtually no discussion or visibility for people who can only fall in love once in there lives, which makes "coming out" or telling about how you feel extremely awkward and frustrating. And yes, people like me can objectively see other people as "attractive," but not be attracted to them. I find androgynous people and women more objectively attractive than men, but I'm only attracted to my partner in any romantic or sexual sense period. It's kinda like thinking fictional characters are nice to look at, but not actually wanting them. I don't mean to be presumptuous or to assume things, but from my perspective, this doesn't seem unreasonable as a sexuality on the ace/aro spectrum. And for people like me, it can be frustrating to look everywhere for answers about who we are only to be met with virtually nothing but a page considered for deletion. It'd be nice if there was more information at least available to us.
Technically Not A Fetish (skiolosexual)[]
I don’t believe that this should be deleted from the wiki. Why? Because it isn’t really a fetish. It’s just like how some people prefer cis ppl to trans ppl, except for the other way around. It’s just what some people prefer. Some trans ppl don’t feel comfortable with cis ppl, and some cis ppl don’t connect well with other cis ppl. It’s just a matter of preference, like uranic, saturnic, and neptunic.